tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post2913801093764825697..comments2024-03-15T05:03:09.921-07:00Comments on Cosonok's IT Blog: SnapMirror Compatibility Matrix for (Clustered) ONTAP 8.0 to 9.1Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-5467918046138072852018-01-24T02:53:32.745-08:002018-01-24T02:53:32.745-08:00Found this recently, don't know if it's ne...Found this recently, don't know if it's new:<br /><br />http://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.pow-dap%2FGUID-0810D764-4CEA-4683-8280-032433B1886B.html&resultof=%22snapmirror%22%20%22compatibility%22%20Siconinohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14261802943535825803noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-66073191296768000922017-09-24T04:57:14.459-07:002017-09-24T04:57:14.459-07:00Absolutely. A LUN is just a file to NetApp, and yo...Absolutely. A LUN is just a file to NetApp, and you can definately recover files on a 9.2 destination. I've not had to try restoring a 9.0 LUN on a 9.2 system but I'd be stunned if it didn't work.Carsonokhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05717017593953701040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-87810166038876391712017-09-22T01:03:44.544-07:002017-09-22T01:03:44.544-07:00Hi, snapmirror relationship compatibility, does it...Hi, snapmirror relationship compatibility, does it mean that you can recover and use data on the destination ? Example : an isci lun on a 9.0 cluster can be replicated to a 9.2 cluster, but could we use the lun replica on the 9.2 cluster ?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13781066549107754512noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-60232463181803467192017-08-09T14:32:05.518-07:002017-08-09T14:32:05.518-07:00Hi Lanorix. The rules are different for 7 to C tra...Hi Lanorix. The rules are different for 7 to C transitions. You'll be fine with 8.2.4 7-mode to 9.0/9.1 Clustered ONTAP. Check out the IMT http://mysupport.netapp.com/matrix and you'll see NetApp supports 7 to C transitions all the way from 7.3.3 7-Mode to 9.1 C-Mode with 7MTT 3.2 (7MTT 3.3 will bring support for ONTAP 9.2). Cheers, VCCarsonokhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05717017593953701040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-65332619287667470142017-08-09T13:45:41.193-07:002017-08-09T13:45:41.193-07:00very nice. We are in a situation where we are runn...very nice. We are in a situation where we are running 8.2.4 7-mode and need to get a new unit for a transition and I want to snap mirror one-way from 8.2.4 to 9.x for a period of time before breaking the link permanently but it appears that's not an option?Lanorixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16069472229402286508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-57252102552136263642017-07-30T00:44:04.393-07:002017-07-30T00:44:04.393-07:00I have discovered that - officially - NetApp Engin...I have discovered that - officially - NetApp Engineering do not support SnapMirror from 8.2 -> 9.1 - basically, this means that it's not been QA'd. So SnapMirror from 8.1 -> 9.1 say, whilst it works, is not officially supported (could try the FPVR process if absolutely essential to get support) and you'd be using it at your own risk.Carsonokhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05717017593953701040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-58231549424331738702017-05-03T01:30:33.587-07:002017-05-03T01:30:33.587-07:00Very, very useful! We have been trying to find an ...Very, very useful! We have been trying to find an "official" table with this info (sm and cdot) as in the past with 7m, but as you mention, it doesn't exist anymore. So, thanks!Siconinohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14261802943535825803noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-68174754080571896522017-04-11T07:46:08.336-07:002017-04-11T07:46:08.336-07:00Thanks Cyrille.Thanks Cyrille.Carsonokhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05717017593953701040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-66040246507430763612017-04-10T01:49:46.984-07:002017-04-10T01:49:46.984-07:00Nice,
Very good article,
Nice, <br />Very good article,<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05439386591097111524noreply@blogger.com