tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post4179960767225026442..comments2024-03-15T05:03:09.921-07:00Comments on Cosonok's IT Blog: net port vlan delete - Error command failed invalid operationUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-33074942002411937062013-10-06T07:10:10.473-07:002013-10-06T07:10:10.473-07:00In this article, e0g-80 is a VLAN and not a LIF. V...In this article, e0g-80 is a VLAN and not a LIF. VLANs are associated with a fixed physical port or ifgrp, they have no home-port attribute. Actually, the example was taken from a SIM (where you can recreate this problem), in reality you'd never see this problem with an e0?-VLAN since you can't remove an onboard port, but can see this problem if someone removes a physical Ethernet IO card without deleting the VLANs that were on it first.Carsonokhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05717017593953701040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-91361147582225426362013-10-01T16:02:30.192-07:002013-10-01T16:02:30.192-07:00Actually if someone removes a card, the -home-port...Actually if someone removes a card, the -home-port will still report e0g, but the -curr-port will have changed (hopefully, if failover-groups...). That is after all the info in the cdb. It is a bit messy as the error message is misleading.<br /><br />If nothing shows on the net int show -home-port e0g-80, then net int show -curr-port e0g-80. But that is not often overlooked. Most often, it is the LIF has been migrated, but not modified, thus locking the delete and giving misleading errors.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-47004503815632772432013-09-27T08:54:20.696-07:002013-09-27T08:54:20.696-07:00I wish it were that easy. If your e0g's disapp...I wish it were that easy. If your e0g's disappeared from your machine (say someone took out a NIC for whatever reason) and you try the -<br />net int show -home-port e0g-80<br />- it comes back with -<br />There are no entries matching your query.Carsonokhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05717017593953701040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4270346497183643494.post-67227429575841501312013-09-26T17:41:32.190-07:002013-09-26T17:41:32.190-07:00a much safer resolution can be had by using
netwo...a much safer resolution can be had by using <br />network interface show -home-port e0g-80<br />followed by the appropriate network interface modify<br />and BING, Bob's your uncle.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com