Introduction
BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) is the
relatively recent phenomenon where company employees bring
personally-owned mobile devices to their place of work to use for
work purposes. To find the beginning of time for BYOD, you could
perhaps go back as far as when the first practical personal laptops,
and/or the first personal mobile phones capable of serving email,
appeared on the market.
Related to BYOD is BYOT (Bring Your Own
Technology) and BYOA (Bring Your Own App.)
There is a lot of debate in the
internet-land regards BYOD, and this following post attempts to pose
and answer the 'Is BYOD Over-hyped?' question, as if from a no camp,
then from a yes camp, and reach a conclusion at the end.
Is BYOD Overhyped? No
Why?
It is important that IT listens to its
consumers. There is nothing worse than a strict totalitarian
authority that manages to crush all attempts at innovation, and bans
things without alternatives being there. Staff should be commended
for bringing their own devices into work for work purposes, but BYOD
should not be left unchecked – IT should be an enabler for secure
BYOD. People are always looking for ways to improve their efficiency
and increase productivity, be it via automation or finding things
that simply make life easier. The IT department should not be a
road-block to new ways of doing things; it is all about working in
partnership, but of course someone has got to be ultimately
responsible for enterprise data security!
Is BYOD Overhyped? Yes
Why?
It is important that employees are
given the correct tools to do their job. If employees are coming into
the work place to do work things on their own devices, then the
corporation is failing to properly equip its staff.
Many a time that a personal device is
brought into the workplace, it is maybe used for a little bit of
work, and then a big bit of personal recreation – be it accessing
websites that are blocked on the corporate internet, playing games,
watching movies. The personal device is a way to circumvent corporate
IT security lock downs that are (usually) in place for good reason.
Security is a problem. If staff are
allowed to download or store work related materials on personal
devices, and if these personal devices – that are not secured by
any enterprise security systems – are the source of leaks or data
loss, this will have repercussions on the corporation whose
responsibility it is to protect that data.
Also, a question that needs to be asked
before going down the route and expense of BYOD enablement, is how
many employees would actually want to bring in to work a personal
device to do work on, if it were possible to do this.
Conclusion
Yes, BYOD is cool and it is funky, but
the IT department must be responsible for all devices accessing
corporate data to maintain enterprise data security.
Vidad, you make some valid points. I agree that “the IT department must be responsible for all devices accessing corporate data to maintain enterprise data security.” However, I don’t think that means BYOD can’t be done securely while also embracing the fundamental idea behind BYOD, which is less management on the part of the company. The company I work for, Symantec, recently acquired Nukona, which makes mobile application management, or MAM, technology. MAM enables enterprises to avoid device-level management and instead implement application-level management on user-owned devices. It does this by allowing enterprises to “wrap” each of their corporate apps and the data tied to them in their own security and management layers. This gives enterprises complete control of their apps and data while leaving the rest of the user-owned devices they are on and also users’ experiences with those devices untouched.
ReplyDeleteSpencer Parkinson
Symantec
Hello Spencer, thank you very much for comment. I'll check out Nukona. Cheers!
Delete